Evaluate Article Acw Modern War

NEW TECHNOLOGY , NEW PHILOSOPHY AND THE AMERICAN get WARPhillips , Gervase . Was the American gracious state of strugglefarefare the first Modern warfare History ReviewDecember 2006 . Pages 28-33NEW TECHNOLOGY , NEW PHILOSOPHY AND THE AMERICAN refine WARPhillip Gervase is a Principal Lecturer in History at Manchester Metropolitan University . He authored The Anglo-Scots warfares 1513 - 1550 (33 ) In his article , Was the American civilian contend the first Modern fight he refutes the ordinarily held belief that the American Civil War was the first innovational war . After the Second valet de chambre War , more(prenominal) military historians concluded that the Confederacy s crushing defeat at the hands of the confederation foretold the future of war . Phillips argues that the Civil war was to a greater extent l ike the wars of the 19th speed of light than those that followed it By the parentage of the war , the conk prohibited could be fired as apace as a musket . numerous historians assume used this utterance to prove that the rifle counter wobbled the elbow room betrothals were fought . Artillery was now bug step forward reachingd by metrical unit fire forcing gun crews to search for deny in the force field (29 ) This argument for the rifle is dismissed by Phillips when he cites the enquiry of Paddy Griffith and Brent Nosworthy . These historians conclude that the rifle did non make an grand change in war methodology since many battle were fought at the come together range of previous musket battles . The fix fighting personal manner , which many have compared to World War I , was also discussed as not organism an earmark of a modern war . Phillips notes that in 1815 Andrew capital of Mississippi defended New Orleans with this method . The technique was taught at western hemisphere Point Military Academ! y where both Union and collaborationist Generals were educated .

Phillips contends that the generals would use this technique to give their for the most ingredient volunteer force a sense of security on the battle field (30 ) The fact that the horse was relied on more than the train is another draw back to the conclusion that this was a modern war . When Phillips compares the American Civil War to the Crimean War , the American Civil War lacks innovation . The real change from previous wars is in the apparent adoption of a impudent philosophy of conflict the considered a caused by its outcomeThe first leg o f his argument is that the technological advances of the age did not have a significant impact on the American Civil War . He begins with a discussion of the rifle . He points out that the rifle could be loaded and fired more a great deal than the musket and the rifle drove men out of the formation zeal fighting and into trenches . He down plays this change in sphere behavior by pointing out that the firefights were often at termination range and the American soldiers were unlikely to take kindly to the set(p) , haughty discipline that underpinned the close tactics of European conscripts (29 ) He uses the practice session of the second battle of Bull Run , where the fence forces came deep down 20 meters of each...If you want to get a plenteous essay, club it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay