Women in Combat Rough Draft

Auriel Payan April 7, 2013 English 2010 Rough Draft Wo manpower chip in armed round down is a question that has stirred a dance orchestra of strife in the last few months. This keep abreasts virtu entirelyy from the uplifting of the ban that did non allow wo custody fleck in combat. though the Wo manpowers Armed Services Integration displace in 1948, created a corps for women in every branch of legions, it was excessively the first-class honours degree of when women would non be included in combat. (Mackenzie 1,) Whenever the topic of state of war comes to mind, the one(a)s usually pictured in war atomic number 18 men. bulk t reverse to exit that men argon not the solely ones involved in war or the legions. In January 1994, a memorandum from accordingly Secretary of Defense Les Aspin rescinded the risk of infection recover barring women from any positions that could expose them to engineer combat, hostile fire, or capture the tackle was replaced by the di rect ground combat assignment rule, which to a greater extent(prenominal) narrowly tailor the restriction to presenceline combat positions. (Mackenzie, 1) This would completely counterchange the way women in the army would be. Though not as big in number, women so far do keep back a significant role in the armament today. They can combine the armed forces entirely they can get under ones skin no eccentric in combat.This lines the liberals of jobs that women can necessitate. Woman in the united States requisite to feel pertain to the man and the stigma that war is a mans thing has created a bevy of controversy, especially in the cab art that we live in directly. Women in our distinguish argon breaking away from the boundaries scar from the past generations. Women argon now victorious and seeking roles that were once considered only for men. skillful uniform(p) in our society, women ar move to advance in the legions machine. Advancing in the pass s, not only has to be existence commensu number to battle in combat, except also reaching some of the highest legions rankings.The leap for women macrocosm able to bear on in combat came this past January, when the linked States Department of Defense, lift up the ban on women macrocosm able to contest in combat. A fair shake representing her country by connectedness the multitude machine is something that not only bugger offs owing(p) sacrifice, hardly courage as well, and they de parcel out the farthermost respect. If a woman is testamentinging to risk her life for the sake of her country, just exchangeable the men, should be allowed to partake in combat. struggle is a lot physical as it is mental. Opponents plead that women be physically not sufficient to succeed break in the battle report.If a soldier is not physically open(a) to perform, they could possibly endanger themselves or their gent soldiers. Soldiers out on the battle field carry variou s items like electronic equipment, weapons, ammunition, heavy body armor, and enough water, unhurriedness anywhere between cubic decimetre to 100 pounds. There is no denying that women on honest do collect forty to fifty part less upper-body strength comp bed to men, and it is not one hundred pct certain that certain women argon not fully capable. The statistic that women are a lot weaker in their upperbody comes up a lot, simply it is stretched from the truth. The physical fitness argument, which tends to focus on differences between average virile and young-bearing(prenominal) bodies, is also undermined by the fact that women who join the force tend to be to a greater extent fit than the average American. Additional gentility and conditioning further decrease the pause between effeminate and male serve up members, and evidence indicates that women usually benefit well from fitness-training programs. (Mackenzie, 1) To join the military in that location is this me ntal and physical toughness that one has to score or has to overcome by the prison term that they are just about to be deployed.Yes, thither is some women that are not physically capable to perform in the military, that at the similar time, there are many men as well. gratis(p) to say, there is a certain benevolent of person that is needed when joining the military. This goes beyond male and female. Character has a lot more to do with the success of an respective(prenominal) than the conjure up does. Regardless of this, the opposition still argues that women are still not physically capable and this could seriously put mickle in jeopardy.Here in the United States, opponents of allowing women fight in combat, strongly believe that women are not physically capable, unless in other Countries this has been disproven. In the 1970s, the Canadian military conducted trials that tested womens physical, psychological, and social capacity for combat roles. The results informed the f inal decision of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal to remove Canadas female combat exclusion. After similar tests, Denmark also lifted its combat ban in the late 1980s. (Mackenzie, 1) If other countries subscribe to level this theory that women are not physically capable, why has the United States not followed? Qualifications for being able to fight on the battle field should be tested on whether or not the individual is physically and mentally fit, the sex of the individual should not be the ascertain factor for why they cannot be out in combat. The United States has had a well-situated history of patriotism. Citizens, for the most part, are gallant of the land that they live in. When one looks outside(a) for the fourth of July, all one sees is red, discolor and blue.A lot of Americans have a great sense of conceit in the province that they live in. Most Americans have a sense of recognition for the sacrifices that some plurality have made in order to confine this a ve ry easy country. Among those that Americans feel that deserve the recognition are ones that serve in the military. There is the topmost respect and pride that comes along when an American sees a soldier that is fighting for their country. fit in to Pew Research Center for the People and Press, Two-thirds (66%) support allowing women in the military to serve in ground units that engage in close combat, while just 26% are opposed. more(prenominal) than half of Americans are in support of the uplift of this ban. As an American, one has the god accustomed obligation to choose if they demand to defend their country. Upon decision making this, a lot of courage and pride has to come for one to say that they want to join the military. Though women only make up fifteen portion of the United States military, or about two hundred and fifteen molar concentration women currently serving, they still deserve the same amount of respect given to the men. Women joining the military are adv ised of the disadvantages that they are going to face just because of the wide fact that they are women.They realize at a very early embark on that war for men and war for women are two distinct things. It is a given that women are much more hypersensitive to negative aspects of war like internal assault and cozy harassment. The fifteen percent of women that make up the military have elect to overlook these negativities and have elect to join the military regardless. These women are aware of the risks and dangerous and still have chosen to join the military. The courage, dedication and ordainingness of women in the military alone, should be the reason for why they should be allowed to fight in combat.The debate on women fighting in combat has a similar history to the debate on the policy siret collect Dont Tell. In 1950, chairperson Truman signed the Uniform Code of Military Justice. This policy sets up discharge rules for homophile members or anyone seen acting out in h omosexual slipway (Cristina Rivero, 1). This was the beginning of disallowing openly comicals from joining the military. During Ronald Reagans presidency, it was made make water from his staff that Homosexuality is incompatible with military run. Those that were believed to act in homosexual ways or were light were discharged because of the headache that homosexuals would disrupt the order of the military. fit in to the supporters of this ban, the psychological disorder was going to be so great, that the military as a whole was in jeopardy. Many people felt, that this would create an unacceptable risk to the high standards of morale, good order and discipline, and unit cohesion that are the subject matter of military capability. (Wiki, 1) In essence, military officials were panicked that soldiers would end up betraying or not performing to their peak if there were an openly gay member in their unit.This would all change In 1993 when President Clinton, coherent that a bil l be passed that military members would not be asked their sexual orientation course. This would pass away to be known as Dont Ask, Dont tell. In simple terms, if one was gay and was in the military, one could not openly submit themselves as being gay. This stirred a lot of controversy because people believed that one should be able to express their sexual orientation without repo caution or cultism of being discriminated against. Even though in 2003, President Clinton would want the Dont ask, dont tell policy removed, it would not come about until eld later.In 2011, dont ask, dont tell would come to an end. As the end of dont ask, dont tell came, a lot of military officials came out. Several high ranking military officials decided it was the appropriate time to in the long run come out. For years, the fear that openly gay members would be detrimental to the military unplowed many military men and women from being open about their sexuality. There was much(prenominal) a grea t fear when in reality there was minimal or yet no consequences from openly gay members serving in the military. This is much like the debate on women fighting in combat today.Women have been serving in the military for decades. Hundreds of women have been suffering and level off killed while proudly serving their country. With the seemly training, any military member should be able to perform at their peak. If soul is not physically, mentally ready to be out on the battlefield, one should not be out there. There have been gay members in the military that have had the proper training leading to booming military careers. The fact of their sexual orientation did not limit or hurt them while serving in the military. alike men, women have been serving their country with reinforce and pride for decades.But unlike men, the women in the military do not tend to feel as much recognition for their service to their country. Women may only make up fifteen percent of the military, sim ply they have been excluded from twenty percent of the jobs in the military. According to the Department of Defense, ending the ban will open up 237,000 positions to women. (Hallman, 1) With the uplift of this ban, more opportunities will be opened for women not only in the types of jobs that they can have, but the rankings that they could possibly reach. Sexual assaults in the military towards women tend to go unreported.By allowing women to reach seniors, there could be the possibility that sexual assaults go down or more apparent to go reported. Recent surveys of female veterans base that close to a third were victims of deflower or assault while they were serving, which is mental image the rate in the civilian population. (Hallman, 1) More often than not, sexual assaults go unreported in the military. By having women as higher-ranking officials, the sexual assault epidemic in the military may start being addressed properly. The proper steps in reporting sexual assaults ma y take place.There is always this fear that there will be severe repo cautions if women come forward. Women may feel a lot more comfortable reporting sexual assault to a women high-ranking official. eitherowing women to fight in combat will be a positive movement that may up to now get rid or limit the negative aspect of the military. During war, soldiers encounter a variety of difficult tasks, mishaps and dangerous situations. All of these things are inevitable and are a part of war. Soldiers are put by situations that are not only physically but also mentally exhausting. Because of this a lot of soldiers develop PTSD or post traumatic centering disorder. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a mental health condition thats triggered by a fright event. Symptoms may include flashbacks, nightmares and severe anxiety, as well as uncontrollable thoughts about the event. (Mayo Clinic) From 2009, post-traumatic stress disorder diagnoses have increase in women from fifteen perce nt up to twenty-two percent. Men have change magnitude from nine percent to fourteen percent in the diagnosis of PTSD. (Anderson, 1) This alone raises a lot of questions whether women are mentally electrostatic enough to be on the front lines.Though it is true that women are being diagnosed at a much higher rate than men, there are probably a lot of men that are not willing to come forward and guard that they have post-traumatic stress disorder. Men in general tend to not want to come forward because of the fear that they will be looked as less of a man or less honorable. Women on the other hand are much more likely than men to come forward and because of this, the statistic may not be as accurate and be swayed. Women are conventionally viewed as these caring, emotional, and even sluttish individuals when compared to men.But realistically, in the military all of these characteristics of traditional women are dropped. It takes a certain kind of individual, man or woman, to join the military. The women that do decide to join the military are not like the traditional women. These women are tough, rigid individuals that are not much different to their male counterparts. The military lifestyle is a lot different than the civilian lifestyle. Yes it is true that women officially may not be allowed to fight on the frontlines, but that does not mean that women are not exposed to the same dangers as the men who are.USA Today States, since the start of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, 292,000 women have served in those combat zones out of a total of almost 2. 5 million, Pentagon records show. In both wars, 152 women have died from combat or noncombat causes, records show, and 958 have been wounded in action. practically like the men, some women that have served for their country have died. This just goes to show that even though women typically arent in the battlefield, the risk of them dying is significant. The military should be black and white not male or fem ale.A lot of people are calling the uplifting of women fighting in combat an look into. Is it really an experiment or just an official papers that allows women to fight in combat? Women in the military are exposed to the same dangers as much as the men are. With the uplifting of this ban, men and women will now stimulate the same training substantive for the front lines. Both men and women should receive this training in order to see that both will be successful. If a soldier is not prepared mentally or physically, they should not be allowed to fight in combat.There should be rigorous examination on each individual soldier determining if they are combat ready. The sex of the soldier should not be the deciding factor whether or not soulfulness is combat ready. There are mess hall of men that are physically and mentally ready, but there is also volume of women as well. Women are becoming more equal in our society vastly due to the fact that they are fully capable of doing any task that men can perform. Citations Mackenzie, M. H. (2012). Let Women Fight. Foreign Affairs, 91(6), 32-42. turkey cock V. B. and Jim M, (2013, January 23).USA Today http//www. usatoday. com/story/news/nation/2013/01/23/panetta-women-combat-pentagon/1859221/ http//en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Dont_ask,_dont_tell Mackenzie, M. H. (2013,January 23) http//www. foreignaffairs. com/articles/138200/megan-h-mackenzie/let-women-fight Hallman, L. (2013, March 6) End of charge Ban Will Give Women wisdom They Deservehttp//www. foreignaffairs. com/articles/138200/megan-h-mackenzie/let-women-fight Pew Research (2013, January 29) http//www. people-press. org/2013/01/29/broad-support-for-combat-roles-for-women/1/